The oral defense of graduation paper of full-time students (cohort 2014-2018) from Department of International Studies.
Updated : 2018/12/25
According to the accredited school action plan – the academic year 2017-2018, on the morning of May 22nd, 2018, the oral defense of students’ graduation paper (Cohort 2014-2018) was formally held by Department of International Studies at 131 Luong Nhu Hoc Campus (UFLS – UDN). This year, there were 17 papers categorized into three Examining Committees on the following themes: International Relations, Laws – Religions and Cultural – Social Sciences.
In order to have a graduation paper qualified enough to be eligible for the defense stage, the students had to work very hard in a long period of time under the significant support of their supervisors. To properly and fully assess such long-term effort of the students, the oral defense session of the Department was carefully prepared and strictly follow the suggested steps. The three Examining Committees were working very hard with a strong sense of responsibility and justice to listen, discuss, debate students’ thesis and finally to come up with some feedbacks for their latter modification of the paper.
According to the accredited school action plan – the academic year 2017-2018, on the morning of May 22nd, 2018, the oral defense of students’ graduation paper (Cohort 2014-2018) was formally held by Department of International Studies at 131 Luong Nhu Hoc Campus (UFLS – UDN). This year, there were 17 papers categorized into three Examining Committees on the following themes: International Relations, Laws – Religions and Cultural – Social Sciences.
In order to have a graduation paper qualified enough to be eligible for the defense stage, the students had to work very hard in a long period of time under the significant support of their supervisors. To properly and fully assess such long-term effort of the students, the oral defense session of the Department was carefully prepared and strictly follow the suggested steps. The three Examining Committees were working very hard with a strong sense of responsibility and justice to listen, discuss, debate students’ thesis and finally to come up with some feedbacks for their latter modification of the paper.
